Secondary science curriculum review: toward the specification of minimum entitlement - Brenda and friends

In April 1983 the Steering Committee of the Secondary Science Curriculum Review published a consultative paper Science Education 11-16: proposals for action and consultation. The paper incorporated a statement of aims for science education which was broadly endorsed by most respondents to the consultation. However, many of the readers of the paper asked for more details as to how the aims might relate to practice.

This booklet on entitlement, published by Heinemann and the Association for Science Education, was written partly to meet that demand, and also to stimulate further discussion as to the shape and direction of future programmes of science education. The booklet was published at a time when it could have a formative interest on the activities of the working groups in the Review.

Show health and safety information

Please be aware that resources have been published on the website in the form that they were originally supplied. This means that procedures reflect general practice and standards applicable at the time resources were produced and cannot be assumed to be acceptable today. Website users are fully responsible for ensuring that any activity, including practical work, which they carry out is in accordance with current regulations related to health and safety and that an appropriate risk assessment has been carried out.

Subject(s)Science
Age14-16
Published1984
Published by

Shelf referenceA 507.1 SEC
Direct URLhttps://www.stem.org.uk/x8bag

This is a physical resource. Come and visit the National STEM Learning Centre library to see it.

Find out more about the Centre